Adverse Childhood Experiences: Roads to Recovery

Clark, H., Royal, P., Robillard Webb, L., Viggars, M., Veale, V., Godfrey, K., Derbyshire, E., Whyte, D., Eddy, J., Murray, A., Murray, Pamela ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8009-6900, Lacey, R., Whewell, E., Sigman, A., Bayou, E., Lowe, D., Lowther, J., Buttery, M., Norman, A., Moss, M., Graham, C., Baits, C., Baty, E., Baker, C., Howe, L., Tonkin, A. and Milligan, L. (2024) Adverse Childhood Experiences: Roads to Recovery. Technical Report. The Cross-Party Group for a Fit and Healthy Childhood, Carradale East.

	Text (Author Upload) ADVERSE-CHILDHOOD-EXPERIENCES-FINAL-REPORT.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (2MB) | Request a copy
Preview	Text Binder4.pdf - Published Version Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

There is a strong correlation between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and a range of significant negative outcomes impacting the life course. Evidence has
shown that adversities rarely occur in isolation. There is a graded dose-response relationship between ACEs in childhood and unfavourable life course outcomes but it is possible to both prevent their occurrence and mitigate their impact.
However, although awareness is growing, ACEs have yet to be approached as a significant public health issue in the UK; assessment of their combined impact with other adverse experiences and circumstances is at best rudimentary and at
population level, there is no co-ordinated strategy that is holistic, fully-inclusive in design and practice, and preventive rather than reactive.
The chapters that follow examine ACEs from a variety of different perspectives but at the outset it is important to remember that public health policy is about people
and in shaping it, there is no substitute for the lived experiences of those who have navigated the rough terrain of ACEs. MQ Mental Health Research:
https://www.mqmentalhealth.org
carried out a survey of its International Lived Experience Network and the responses received convey the deep-seated effects of ACEs but also the potential
pathways to healing and reform.
One individual recounts the profound impact of emotional neglect, stating: ‘I grew up with low social esteem following very heavy punishment and lack of
emotional consideration as a child.’
Their transformation from a place of neglect to becoming ‘a vibrant person’ speaks to the potential of change following supportive interventions. Physical and
emotional abuse alongside witnessing domestic violence is recounted by another respondent who shares:
‘Abuse fosters fear. Fear leads to cocooning oneself.’
And an individual with a background of various ACEs, including mental illness and substance misuse, illustrates the importance of addressing the intergenerational
impact of trauma:
‘Trauma can be transmitted through parenting behaviours and family dynamics, perpetuating a cycle of adversity.’
The respondents’ voices are powerful, their experience diverse yet their message is unified: the UK Government must adopt a comprehensive, multi-faceted public
health approach to ACEs. People who have suffered and are suffering from them are not just data points; they are a clarion call for change, a call that government is
supremely qualified to answer. In summary therefore, ACEs, so often compartmentalised as a focus of individual and family tragedy, are ultimately a government responsibility. The ‘road to recovery’ will benefit us all and this report
is a first step in defining what that road might be. While every ACE story is individual, the response is, and must be, collective. Their stories are our stories and their recovery will be our recovery too.

Actions (login required)

View Item