University of Worcester Worcester Research and Publications
 
  USER PANEL:
  ABOUT THE COLLECTION:
  CONTACT DETAILS:

The Metaethics of Nursing Codes of Ethics and Conduct

Snelling, Paul ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9781-0784 (2016) The Metaethics of Nursing Codes of Ethics and Conduct. Nursing Philosophy, 17 (4). pp. 229-249. ISSN Online: 1466-769X

[thumbnail of The metaethics of nursing codes for wrap.pdf] Text
The metaethics of nursing codes for wrap.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (728kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of The metaethics of nursing codes for wrap.pdf]
Preview
Text
The metaethics of nursing codes for wrap.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (691kB) | Preview

Abstract

Nursing codes of ethics and conduct are features of professional practice across the world, and in the UK, the regulator has recently consulted on and published a new code. Initially part of a professionalising agenda, nursing codes have recently come to represent a managerialist and disciplinary agenda and nursing can no longer be regarded as a self-regulating profession.This paper argues that codes of ethics and codes of conduct are significantly different in form and function similar to the difference between ethics and law in everyday life. Some codes successfully integrate these two functions within the same document, while others, principally the UK Code, conflate them resulting in an ambiguous document unable to fulfil its functions effectively. The paper analyses the differences between ethical- codes and conduct-codes by discussing titles, authorship, level, scope for disagreement, consequences of transgression, language and finally and possibly most importantly agent-centeredness. It is argued that conduct codes cannot require nurses to be compassionate because compassion involves an emotional response. The concept of kindness provides a plausible alternative for conduct-codes as it is possible to understand it solely in terms of acts. But if kindness is required in conduct-codes, investigation and possible censure follows from its absence. Using examples it is argued that there are at last five possible accounts of the absence of kindness. As well as being potentially problematic for disciplinary panels, difficulty in understanding the features of blameworthy absence of kindness may challenge UK nurses who, following a recently introduced revalidation procedure, are required to reflect on their practice in relation to The Code. It is concluded that closer attention to metaethical concerns by code writers will better support the functions of their issuing organisations.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information:

Staff and students at the University of Worcester can access the full-text of the online published article via the online Library Search. External users should check availability with their local library or Interlibrary Requests Service.

Uncontrolled Discrete Keywords: professional ethics, metaethics, code of conduct, regulation, compassion, kindness
Subjects: R Medicine > RT Nursing
Divisions: College of Health, Life and Environmental Sciences > School of Nursing and Midwifery
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Paul Snelling
Date Deposited: 27 May 2016 09:36
Last Modified: 01 Jul 2020 11:01
URI: https://worc-9.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/4503

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
 
     
Worcester Research and Publications is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.