Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study

Anderson, N.E., Kyte, Derek ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7679-6741, McMullan, C., Cockwell, P., Lee Aiyegbusi, O., Verdi, R. and Calvert, M. (2023) Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open, 13 (7). ISSN Electronic: 2044-6055

Preview

Text e070927.full.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (845kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objectives The use of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems to support the management of patients with chronic kidney disease is increasing. This mixed-methods study aimed to comprehensively identify existing and developing ePRO systems, used in nephrology settings globally, ascertaining key characteristics and factors for successful implementation.

Study design ePRO systems and developers were identified through a scoping review of the literature and contact with field experts. Developers were invited to participate in a structured survey, to summarise key system characteristics including: (1) system objectives, (2) population, (3) PRO measures used, (4) level of automation, (5) reporting, (6) integration into workflow and (7) links to electronic health records/national registries. Subsequent semistructured interviews were conducted to explore responses.

Setting and participants Eligible systems included those being developed or used in nephrology settings to assess ePROs and summarise results to care providers. System developers included those with a key responsibility for aspects of the design, development or implementation of an eligible system.

Analytical approach Structured survey data were summarised using descriptive statistics. Interview transcripts were analysed using Codebook Thematic Analysis using domains from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results Fifteen unique ePRO systems were identified across seven countries; 10 system developers completed the structured survey and 7 participated in semistructured interviews. Despite system heterogeneity, reported features required for effective implementation included early and sustained patient involvement, clinician champions and expanding existing electronic platforms to integrate ePROs. Systems demonstrated several common features, with the majority being implemented within research settings, thereby affecting system implementation readiness for real-world application.

Conclusions There has been considerable research investment in ePRO systems. The findings of this study outline key system features and factors to support the successful implementation of ePROs in routine kidney care.Cite Now

Actions (login required)

View Item