Diagnosing the Nazis

Toon, Wendy ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7876-3214 (2016) Diagnosing the Nazis. In: Public Lecture, 21 July 2016, The Chapel, City Campus, University of Worcester. (Unpublished)

	Text TheInfirmary-DiagnosingTheNazis-2016-Abstract.docx Restricted to Repository staff only Download (17kB) | Request a copy
	Text (Abstract) TheInfirmary-DiagnosingTheNazis-2016-Abstract.pdf - Other Restricted to Repository staff only Download (142kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

One of the lesser known aspects of the American war effort during World War II was that a variety of experts from a number of academic and clinical disciplines including, sociologists, psychoanalysts, clinicians, anthropologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, historians, geographers, educationalists, columnists/commentators, political scientists, Asianists, philosophers, theologians, economists and filmmakers took it upon themselves, or were contracted via government or military service, to diagnose the contents of a disease, sometimes called Nazism, sometimes Germanism, sometimes Hitlerism or sometimes Prussianism. They became the Doctors and the German people and nation state, the patients, in this unique attempt to solve an exceptional problem: the problem of “what to do” with Germany. As Lawrence K. Frank, Chairman, Joint Committee on Postwar Planning explained: ‘a nation is a group of persons whose feelings and conduct approximate the modal patterns, therefore what they will think and do can be forecast with a high degree of reliability once we learn the basic patterns and regularities of their cultural traditions.’ This was the premise on which the Nazis were diagnosed.

Actions (login required)

View Item